bug#47813: 28.0.50; Confusing new calling convention for define-minor-mode

[Stefan Monnier]

Lars Ingebrigtsen [2021-04-17 13:49:13] wrote:
> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> I went with
>>
>>     (mode doc [keyword val ...] &rest body)
>>
>> since it's allowed to have no keywords (if body is empty).
>
> It still kinda looks like the keywords are optional, even if you have a
> body.  What about:
>
>   (mode doc [keyword val ... &rest body])

Done, thanks,


        Stefan