Thanks for the quick response! The changes sound good to me.
Hello, Sheng.
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 03:57:01 -0500, Sheng Yang wrote:
> Any update/decision on this? The discussions have been inactive for more than 2 weeks.
Sorry, I got distracted by another project which turned out to be bigger
than expected.
I will decide this, basically to follow Drew's suggestion, since he is
the only one with strong views on the subject. What's more, I am now
convinced he is right. ;-)
To sum up, the minibuffer will always be in `minibuffer-mode', regardless
of whether it is active or inactive. The minibuffer-mode key map will be
in force for INactive MBs, the map supplied by the commands will be in
force for active MBs. There will be compatibility aliases to
`minibuffer-inactive-mode', etc.
I think this will enable you to solve the problems you have.
It will likely take me a few more days actually to implement this.
[ .... ]
> Sheng Yang(杨圣), PhD
> Computer Science Department
> University of Maryland, College Park
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).