[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command'
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command' |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Feb 2021 19:36:17 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 11:01:11 -0600
> Cc: rms@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, 46627@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> So I type `C-h a foobar RET'.
>
> Now I realize I want to look for "foobaz", so `C-h a foobaz RET'.
>
> Now I realize that oops, I meant "barsnaz", etc.
>
> Typing this at a prompt is often faster for me. In particular, I don't
> need to rewrite everything for minor changes.
>
> Yes, I can be smarter and say `C-h a M-p DEL z RET', but I think we can
> agree that `DEL z TAB' is less typing.
No, I think you are splitting hair. Typing one more key justifies a
whole new command? Really?
And I'm not even talking about the display you get with "C-h a", which
is much more informative than what completion shows.
> (BTW, with many completion frameworks you don't even need the TAB.)
We are talking about features that are built-in. Otherwise, why did
we add a new command for getting help on commands, when it's so easy
to get it from other completion frameworks?
> Plus I often look only for names, and don't need to waste screen real
> estate on documentation (which I would using apropos).
Displaying completion candidates doesn't use any screen estate?
> I don't see that we need to agree about the relative efficiency of these
> workflows. We can and do support both workflows well.
See my other message: building a discovery subsystem starting from
completion reinvents the wheel, and begins from an inferior starting
point. If that's not an argument worth considering, from the project
management POV, then I don't know what is.
- bug#46627: [External] : bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', (continued)
- bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', Richard Stallman, 2021/02/21
- bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', Stefan Kangas, 2021/02/21
- bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/21
- bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', Howard Melman, 2021/02/21
- bug#46627: [External] : bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', Drew Adams, 2021/02/21
- bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', Stefan Kangas, 2021/02/21
- bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command',
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', Stefan Kangas, 2021/02/21
- bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/21
- bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/21
- bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/21
- bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/21
- bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/22
- bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/27
- bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/28
- bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/28
- bug#46627: [External] : bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command', Drew Adams, 2021/02/21