[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names
|
From: |
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson |
|
Subject: |
bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names |
|
Date: |
Wed, 10 Feb 2021 20:36:15 +0800 |
>>>>> "GH" == Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org> writes:
GH> Perhaps that would be an enhancement request: when all completion
GH> candidates start with the same prefix, add it to the input string when
GH> minibuffer-complete is called.
Yes, that sounds great!
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2021/02/07
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/08
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2021/02/09
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/09
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2021/02/09
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/10
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2021/02/10
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/10
- bug#46368: Completion vs. "*" buffer names,
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <=