bug#23085: 24.5; `customized-changed-options`

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> I'm not sure this change is for the better: no one said that "options"
> should be interpreted narrowly as referring only to variables; and
> "customize-changed" is simply bad English and doesn't help
> understanding what it is about.  So I think Richard was right with
> that change.

Richard added the (perhaps oddly named) `customize-changed' alias,
though.

I have no strong opinions about this, but we do usually refer to
defcustom'd variables as "user options", so it doesn't seem unreasonable
for a user to expect that `customize-changed-options' will list only
"user options" -- that seems like a natural expectation in this context,
even if "options" has a wider meaning outside a Customize context.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no