[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#46298: 28.0.50; Best default for ispell-program-name
From: |
Peter Oliver |
Subject: |
bug#46298: 28.0.50; Best default for ispell-program-name |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Feb 2021 16:03:15 +0000 (GMT) |
The default value of ispell-program-name is decided by looking in turn for the
binaries aspell, ispell, hunspell and enchant-2, and using whichever is first
found. Would it make sense to sort these in order of which we believe to be
best?
As I understand it, which backend is most accurate varies from language to
language. Assuming the quality of the Emacs integration is equal, I would
suggest putting Enchant first on the list rather than last. Enchant doesnʼt do
any spellchecking itself, but instead selects a backend based on a per-language
configuration preference, automatically skipping any backends which are not
installed or for which dictionaries are not installed in the current language.
I notice that the Red Hat/Fedora packages patch Emacs to put Hunspell first on
the list
(https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs/blob/rawhide/f/emacs-spellchecker.patch).
The rationale for this was that if Aspell was installed but the Aspell
dictionaries for a language were not, then ispell-buffer fails
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713600). If, instead, Enchant was
tried first, this kind of tinkering would not be necessary.
--
Peter Oliver
- bug#46298: 28.0.50; Best default for ispell-program-name,
Peter Oliver <=