[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#45033: 28.0.50; New option gnus-registery-register-all-p
From: |
Basil L. Contovounesios |
Subject: |
bug#45033: 28.0.50; New option gnus-registery-register-all-p |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Dec 2020 23:16:11 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
> From 1b94a5bc72ac56a132f73b5d1732800ac0ee830d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 15:58:57 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] New option gnus-registry-register-all
>
> * lisp/gnus/gnus-registry.el (gnus-registry-register-all): If nil,
> the registry won't automatically create new entries for all seen
> messages. Defaults to t to preserve previous behavior.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[...]
> +If @code{gnus-registry-register-all} is non-nil (the default), the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +registry will perform splitting for all messages. If it is nil,
> +splitting will only happen for children of messages you've explicitly
> +registered.
[...]
> ++++
> +*** New user option 'gnus-registry-register-all'.
> +
> +If non-nil (the default), create registry entries for all messages.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +If nil, don't automatically create entries, they must be created
> +manually.
[...]
> +(defcustom gnus-registry-register-all nil
^^^
> + "If non-nil, register all articles in the registry."
> + :type 'boolean
> + :version "28.1")
Was the user option meant to be initialised to t?
Thanks,
--
Basil