[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#44861: 27.1; [PATCH] signal in `replace-regexp-in-string'
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#44861: 27.1; [PATCH] signal in `replace-regexp-in-string' |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:41:32 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 05:43:29 -0800
> Cc: 44861@debbugs.gnu.org, Shigeru Fukaya <shigeru.fukaya@gmail.com>
>
> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>
> > But I wonder -- would it make sense to move the entire
> > replace-regexp-in-string function to C?
>
> Before we undertake any major changes in that direction, perhaps we
> should benchmark the relevant functions on the native-comp branch? It
> changes the benchmarks by quite a lot in some cases.
Benchmarking is always welcome, but I don't think we should dismiss
performance improvements by assuming everyone will use the
natively-compiled Lisp code VSN. I'm quite sure *.elc files will be
used in the observable future by many people. I also expect C code to
run faster than natively-compiled Lisp, when significant
implementation changes, such as those suggested by Mattias, are
involved.
- bug#44861: 27.1; [PATCH] signal in `replace-regexp-in-string', (continued)
- bug#44861: 27.1; [PATCH] signal in `replace-regexp-in-string', Mattias Engdegård, 2020/11/25
- bug#44861: 27.1; [PATCH] signal in `replace-regexp-in-string', Stefan Kangas, 2020/11/25
- bug#44861: 27.1; [PATCH] signal in `replace-regexp-in-string', Mattias Engdegård, 2020/11/26
- bug#44861: 27.1; [PATCH] signal in `replace-regexp-in-string', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/11/26
- bug#44861: 27.1; [PATCH] signal in `replace-regexp-in-string', Mattias Engdegård, 2020/11/26
- bug#44861: 27.1; [PATCH] signal in `replace-regexp-in-string', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/11/26
- bug#44861: 27.1; [PATCH] signal in `replace-regexp-in-string', Mattias Engdegård, 2020/11/26
- bug#44861: 27.1; [PATCH] signal in `replace-regexp-in-string', Basil L. Contovounesios, 2020/11/29
- bug#44861: 27.1; [PATCH] signal in `replace-regexp-in-string', Stefan Kangas, 2020/11/26
- bug#44861: 27.1; [PATCH] signal in `replace-regexp-in-string', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/11/26
- bug#44861: 27.1; [PATCH] signal in `replace-regexp-in-string',
Eli Zaretskii <=