[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#44205: [PATCH] Add new function seq-remove-item
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
bug#44205: [PATCH] Add new function seq-remove-item |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:07:52 -0500 |
"Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie> writes:
> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>
>> Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> writes:
>>
>>> I found myself reaching for a version of `seq-remove' where I don't have
>>> to supply a lambda but can just give an item. Ergo, the attached.
>>>
>>> (seq-remove-item 2 '(1 2 3)) => (1 3)
>>>
>>> I find it a whole lot nicer than:
>>>
>>> (seq-remove (lambda (a) (= a 2)) '(1 2 3)) => (1 3)
>>
>> Isn't this just
>>
>> (remove 2 '(1 2 3)) => (1 3)
>>
>> though? I don't think seq.el needs to replicate the basic list
>> functions...
>
> I think the idea is that seq.el functions are generic and can thus be
> extended to work with e.g. streams[1].
That was the idea, yes.
It is fairly minor even in my use, so I have no qualms with just closing
this as wontfix if people think it's not worthwhile enough to add.
- bug#44205: [PATCH] Add new function seq-remove-item,
Stefan Kangas <=