[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#44577: 27.1; Missing options in definition of edebug-mode in edebug.
bug#44577: 27.1; Missing options in definition of edebug-mode in edebug.el
Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:53:24 +0200
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <email@example.com>
> Cc: Stefan Kangas <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com,
> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:54:19 +0100
> Eli Zaretskii <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > I think we should remove the list from the doc string, yes. It is
> > unusual for a doc string of a mode to include an exhaustive list of
> > all of its customization options; in general, the feature's group
> > should be enough to discover all of them. And the manual documents
> > the most important ones.
> The use case here is the `?' command when edebugging, which makes the
> list somewhat useful.
Cannot the '?' command map over the customization group instead? It's
a maintenance burden to keep that list exhaustive and up-to-date, just
so '?' could show all of the options.