[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#28080: 25.2; `outline-invisible-p' should be specific to `invisible'

From: Stefan Kangas
Subject: bug#28080: 25.2; `outline-invisible-p' should be specific to `invisible' property of `outline.el'
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:32:38 -0800

Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:

>> > > (It also should not be a `defsubst'.  1985 has come and gone.)
>> >
>> > Except it is still a defsubst.  It is called within some loops, so
>> > perhaps we should at least see some numbers before changing that?
>> Doesn't matter what the numbers are, IMHO.  `defsubst' should be
>> dropped altogether now.  It was annoying 30 years ago, and it's
>> still annoying - for no real benefit. ;-)
> (2017 has also come and gone.)  This is still a defsubst.
> Could we please get it promoted to a defun now?  Thx.

Noam has a point though: it would be nice to see some numbers before we
change it.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]