[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#28080: 25.2; `outline-invisible-p' should be specific to `invisible'
|
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
|
Subject: |
bug#28080: 25.2; `outline-invisible-p' should be specific to `invisible' property of `outline.el' |
|
Date: |
Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:32:38 -0800 |
Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
>> > > (It also should not be a `defsubst'. 1985 has come and gone.)
>> >
>> > Except it is still a defsubst. It is called within some loops, so
>> > perhaps we should at least see some numbers before changing that?
>>
>> Doesn't matter what the numbers are, IMHO. `defsubst' should be
>> dropped altogether now. It was annoying 30 years ago, and it's
>> still annoying - for no real benefit. ;-)
>
> (2017 has also come and gone.) This is still a defsubst.
> Could we please get it promoted to a defun now? Thx.
Noam has a point though: it would be nice to see some numbers before we
change it.