bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#44134: 28.0.50; epa-list-keys failing with ‘wrong type argument: int


From: Colin Baxter
Subject: bug#44134: 28.0.50; epa-list-keys failing with ‘wrong type argument: interger-or-marker-p, nil’
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:21:54 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)

>>>>> Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net> writes:

    > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:05:31 +0100 Colin Baxter <m43cap@yandex.com> wrote:
    >> Hello Stephen,
    >>>>>>> Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net> writes:
    >> 
    >> > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:23:35 +0100 Colin Baxter <m43cap@yandex.com> 
wrote:
    >> >>>>>>> Pankaj Jangid <pankaj.jangid@codeisgreat.com> writes:
    >> >> 
    >> >> > Steps: 1. M-x epa-list-keys RET ⇒ (lists keys) 2. q 3. M-x >
    >> >> epa-list-keys RET ⇒ Wrong type argument: interger-or-marker-p,
    >> >> nil
    >> >> 
    >> >> Works for me using emacs-28.0.50 and emacs-27.1.
    >> 
    >> > It works in emacs-27 but AFAICT it cannot work with emacs -Q
    >> from > master.
    >> 
    >> I'm afraid emacs -Q does work for me on master. However, there is
    >> a subtlety in that if M-x epa-list-keys <RET> is entered first,
    >> the public keys are listed, but if entered a second time (after
    >> first entering 'q' to remove the keys buffer) the error message
    >> 
    >> epa-list-keys: Wrong type argument: integer-or-marker-p, nil
    >> 
    >> is obtained.

    > That's precisely the bug, look closely at the above recipe again!

    >> Do you want me to apply your patch to see if it makes any
    >> difference?

    > Yes, please do.

Ok, patch applied to my setup and it appears to work.

emacs -Q <RET>
M-x epa-list-keys <RET> --> keys listed
q
M-x epa-list-keys <RET> --> keys listed
repeated 2 more times> --> same outcome
repeated 2 more times using epa-list-secret-keys --> keys listed

Would it be possible to use 'q' to kill the keys-buffer rather than hide
it? That way, the buffer will not display an old duplicate listing.


Colin Baxter.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]