[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#43439: [PATCH] doprnt improvements
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#43439: [PATCH] doprnt improvements |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Oct 2020 21:12:05 +0300 |
> Cc: 43439@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:58:49 -0700
>
> On 9/18/20 12:30 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > How about ... we modify doprint to exit when either it finds
> > NUL or reaches the character specified by FORMAT_END? This will allow
> > us to keep some of the feature, and I think the amount of changes will
> > be smaller. It should also not be much slower than what you propose.
>
> Better yet, let's leave doprnt's API unchanged, and add a function evsnprintf
> (named by analogy from esprintf) whose API is like C vsnprintf but which does
> formatting the Emacs way.
No, let's not, please. I didn't agree to modifying doprnt in
significant ways, so you are now suggesting to do an even more radical
modification, just under another name? This is moving away of a
potential compromise point, not towards it.
- bug#43439: [PATCH] doprnt improvements, Paul Eggert, 2020/10/15
- bug#43439: [PATCH] doprnt improvements,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#43439: [PATCH] doprnt improvements, Paul Eggert, 2020/10/15
- bug#43439: [PATCH] doprnt improvements, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/15
- bug#43439: [PATCH] doprnt improvements, Paul Eggert, 2020/10/15
- bug#43439: [PATCH] doprnt improvements, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/17
- bug#43439: [PATCH] doprnt improvements, Paul Eggert, 2020/10/17
- bug#43439: [PATCH] doprnt improvements, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/24
- bug#43439: [PATCH] doprnt improvements, Paul Eggert, 2020/10/24