[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Oct 2020 18:10:48 +0300 |
> From: Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org>
> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 17:05:23 +0200
> Cc: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>, ttn@gnuvola.org, larsi@gnus.org,
> 43866@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> 9 okt. 2020 kl. 16.31 skrev Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
>
> > Based on the discussion, I've decided to make a minimal change, so I
> > added E= as a sequence for the Euro sign to Latin-1 language input
> > methods (on the master branch).
>
> The minimal change would be to do it for italian-postfix only but perhaps it
> doesn't hurt too much elsewhere.
I couldn't explain to myself why Italian should have it, but, say,
German or French shouldn't.
> (I don't think prefix methods need it.)
OK.
> > Any reason not to close this bug report now?
>
> Maybe it merits a NEWS entry?
Sounds too small to announce, but if others think it should be in
NEWS, I won't object.
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, (continued)
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2020/10/09
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Robert Pluim, 2020/10/09
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/09
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Robert Pluim, 2020/10/09
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/09
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/10/10
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Robert Pluim, 2020/10/12
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/10/09
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Robert Pluim, 2020/10/09
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/10/09
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions, Robert Pluim, 2020/10/09