[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#43598: replace-in-string: finishing touches
|
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
|
Subject: |
bug#43598: replace-in-string: finishing touches |
|
Date: |
Thu, 24 Sep 2020 23:19:26 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
That is, we could just say "the results are undefined if the strings
contain raw bytes". Well, rather, if both strings are raw bytes, or
none of them are, then it's well-defined, but not otherwise.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- bug#43598: replace-in-string: finishing touches, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/09/24
- bug#43598: replace-in-string: finishing touches, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/24
- bug#43598: replace-in-string: finishing touches, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/09/25
- bug#43598: replace-in-string: finishing touches, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/25
- bug#43598: replace-in-string: finishing touches, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/09/25
- bug#43598: replace-in-string: finishing touches, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/25
- bug#43598: replace-in-string: finishing touches, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/26
- bug#43598: replace-in-string: finishing touches, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/26