[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#23486: 25.0.93; Modules: features missing from make_function
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#23486: 25.0.93; Modules: features missing from make_function |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Sep 2020 15:59:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
npostavs@users.sourceforge.net writes:
> Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> This is now done (commit
>> 31fded0370c3aa6d2c4370cae21cdb7475873483). This fixes (1) through
>> (3). (4) through (6) are still open. That's probably OK if the
>> limitations are documented; modules can always do the equivalent of
>> (eval ' (defun ...)) to get complete support.
>
> Lisp_Subr's have an intspec field (4), but I agree it's not really
> essential. As I think you mentioned in the OP, supporting `declare' (5)
> is not doable by definition (because the effects of 'declare' operate on
> the symbol, not the function object).
>
> Docstrings containing null or non-Unicode characters (6) just seems
> completely pointless to me. Are there any cases using that capability
> in Emacs (or outside Emacs)? I would probably consider them as bugs.
This was the final message in this thread. Philipp's patch fixed the
main problems, and (5) and (6) doesn't sound like something that
can/should be fixed. Which leaves (4), which didn't seem essential,
either.
So is there more to be done here, or should this bug report be closed?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- bug#23486: 25.0.93; Modules: features missing from make_function,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=