bug#40688: 28.0.50; Advice And ByteCompile Behavior Change

[T.V Raman]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

I didn't mean the -j bit in building emacs, conjecture is that emacspeak
breaks if -j is used.


>> 4. As mentioned in this bug report at the outset I started seeing
>> strange behavior (that also appeared non-deterministic across builds)
>> where it felt like some of the advice was not defined (incidentally when
>> the bug bit yesterday, C-h o still indicated the functions were
>> adviced).
>
> If it bites again, could you try and post (to the extent possible,
> obviously) the function name, the output of (symbol-function
> <thefunction>) along with as much as possible a concrete and detailed
> description of an actual call's behavior on that function where we see
> that the advice wasn't called?
>
>> So wild conjecture:  Given make -j (the Makefile does impose some
>> dependency order but not all)
>> is it possible that things go south if something that is needed during
>> the build of module-a.el gets byte-compiled *after* module-a.el?
>
> In theory, no.  I (and many other people) build Emacs's `lisp` subdir in
> parallel, and there are basically no dependencies in the makefile to try
> and make sure files get compiled before they're used.  We've had some
> corner case problems with it, but all the ones I know have been fixed.
>
>
>         Stefan
>
>
>> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>>
>>> IIUC after recompiling everything the problem disappeared.  If you
>>> can't reproduce it any more, than I guess we can only close this
>>> bug.
>>>
>>>> As an example, Module emacspeak-advice.el advices vc-next-action --- and
>>>> this module (emacspeak-advice) is loaded early on during emacspeak
>>>> initialization.
>>>>
>>>> When I later call vc-next-action during an emacs session and the
>>>> autoload pulls in vc.el, the advice definition loaded earlier is not
>>>> activated -- I have to explicitly reload module emacspeak-advice.
>>>
>>> In case you can still reproduce the problem, please show us what
>>> `C-h o vc-next-action` tells you when you think it should have the
>>> advice applied yet its behavior doesn't seem to be affected.
>>>
>>>
>>>         Stefan
>>>
>

--