[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:18:20 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 |
On 4/28/20 9:36 PM, Drew Adams wrote:
> Elisp is like CL was BEFORE the proposal I quoted,
No, that's backwards. CLtL1 was hazy, but arguably would have disallowed Elisp's
behavior because it arguably required the interpreter to immediately respond to
changes in objects currently being executed, and arguably required the
interpreter to not coalesce identical literals, and the Elisp interpreter
violates both requirements. In contrast, CLtL2 allows the Elisp behavior, so
CLtL2 is the better way to go here.
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, (continued)
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Drew Adams, 2020/04/28
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/04/28
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Drew Adams, 2020/04/28
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Michael Heerdegen, 2020/04/28
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Paul Eggert, 2020/04/28
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Drew Adams, 2020/04/29
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects,
Paul Eggert <=
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Richard Stallman, 2020/04/30
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/04/30
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/04/28
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Drew Adams, 2020/04/28
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Paul Eggert, 2020/04/28
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Michael Heerdegen, 2020/04/28
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Paul Eggert, 2020/04/28
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Michael Heerdegen, 2020/04/29
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/29
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Paul Eggert, 2020/04/29