[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Apr 2020 18:37:23 +0200 |
tags 40671 patch
stop
[Sorry about the truncated message.]
> Can we modify literal objects?
No, and the manual should do a much better job at explaining this. At the very
least it should not promulgate bad ideas by including mutation of literals in
example code. Patch attached, suggested for emacs-27.
We should not even try to show what happens when the user breaks the rule,
because it is undefined.
0001-Don-t-mutate-literals-in-manual-examples-bug-40671.patch
Description: Binary data
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Kevin Vigouroux, 2020/04/16
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/04/17
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects,
Mattias Engdegård <=
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Paul Eggert, 2020/04/18
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Drew Adams, 2020/04/18
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Noam Postavsky, 2020/04/18
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Paul Eggert, 2020/04/19
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Drew Adams, 2020/04/19
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Paul Eggert, 2020/04/19
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Drew Adams, 2020/04/19
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Paul Eggert, 2020/04/19
- bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects, Drew Adams, 2020/04/20