[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:22:23 +0100 |
> That certainly sounds better, thank you, although I'm still wondering if
> the "layout" gdb-mi speaks of really corresponds exactly to the usual
> window configuration (the object/data structure)? And if it does, it
> still seems to me that it would be better to just use the Emacs term,
> for the reasons I explained in my previous message, but as an only very
> occasional GDB user I don't feel I should be pushing for such a change.
I would use the term "layout" for what is visible on screen and
"configuration" for the underlying data structure.
>> I'd mention it in section 27.6.5.1 GDB User Interface Layout of the
>> Emacs manual.
>
> FWIW, I found that section confusing for other reasons as well, e.g. it
> seems to even mix "frame layout" and "window layout" in apparently the
> same sense? I think fixing _that_ at least should be uncontroversial. :-)
Let alone the fact that "frame" in the context of GDB and Emacs has two
quite different meanings ...
martin
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, (continued)
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, Yuan Fu, 2020/03/07
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, martin rudalics, 2020/03/09
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, Yuan Fu, 2020/03/09
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/09
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, Yuan Fu, 2020/03/09
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/09
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, martin rudalics, 2020/03/10
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, Fu Yuan, 2020/03/10
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, martin rudalics, 2020/03/11
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/11
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/12
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, Yuan Fu, 2020/03/12
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, Yuan Fu, 2020/03/13
- Message not available
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/13
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, Yuan Fu, 2020/03/13
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/13
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, martin rudalics, 2020/03/15
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, Yuan Fu, 2020/03/15
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, martin rudalics, 2020/03/16
- bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout, Yuan Fu, 2020/03/20