[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#39517: [PATCH] Add new option 'word-wrap-boundary'

From: Jaehwang Jerry Jung
Subject: bug#39517: [PATCH] Add new option 'word-wrap-boundary'
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:36:01 +0900
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1

Hi. Thank you for the comments.
On 2/10/20 12:34 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Jaehwang Jerry Jung <address@hidden>
Date: Sun,  9 Feb 2020 16:43:34 +0900
Cc: Jaehwang Jerry Jung <address@hidden>

* src/buffer.c (syms_of_buffer): Define buffer-local variable
* src/buffer.h (struct buffer): Add word_wrap_boundary_.
* src/xdisp.c (IT_DISPLAYING_WORD_WRAP_BOUNDARY): replaces
Thank you for your interest in Emacs.

When proposing a new feature, please always describe the rationale and
relevant practical use cases.  In this case, it is not clear to me
when it would make sense to allow arbitrary characters as wrap
boundaries.  Maybe you had only white-space characters in mind, but
then why not use [:space:] or some Unicode category specification
instead of allowing any characters?
I noticed that word wrapping looks a bit weird when the text contains
long URLs.  So I wanted to add non-word ASCII characters so that URLs
can be wrapped more naturally as in other editors, while not changing
the default behavior.
+  /* Characters that may cause word wrapping.  */
+  Lisp_Object word_wrap_boundary_;
Any reason this is a Lisp object and not a C string?
No specific reason for that. I chose Lisp object because other members
like name_ are Lisp objects too.

-  ((it->what == IT_CHARACTER && (it->c == ' ' || it->c == '\t'))	\
+  ((it->what == IT_CHARACTER						\
+    && strchr ((char *) SDATA (BVAR (current_buffer, word_wrap_boundary)), \
+		it->c))							\
This cannot be right: characters are stored in Lisp strings in a
multibyte encoding that is superset of UTF-8, so the above will only
support pure-ASCII boundary characters, which is probably not what you
had in mind.
You're right. Actually I think it would be simpler to hard-code a better
list of boundary characters in that macro.
This feature, if we decide to accept it, will also need to be
described in the Emacs user manual, as that is why you exposed this to
Lisp.  We would also want a defcustom form for it, probably in
Thanks for letting me know that.
Last, but not least, for a contribution this large, we will need you
to assign the copyright to the FSF.  If you agree, I will send you the
form to fill and the instructions to send it.
Yes, I agree.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]