[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#38154: Man-follow-manual-reference could be as sharp as M-x man itse
|
From: |
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson |
|
Subject: |
bug#38154: Man-follow-manual-reference could be as sharp as M-x man itself |
|
Date: |
Mon, 18 Nov 2019 02:59:16 +0800 |
>>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
>> <jidanni@jidanni.org>
>> Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 19:18:27 +0800
>>
>> Sure, I'll tell the authors to use
>>
>> SEE ALSO
>> v.segment(1grass), v.split(1grass), v.to.rast(1grass), v.to.db(1grass)
>>
>> but in the meantime, Man-follow-manual-reference should be beefed up...
EZ> FWIW, I'm not at all sure. It's an invalid man page (a.k.a. "bug"),
EZ> so why should we support it?
It's even the way these document pros make their man pages:
$ man perldoc
SEE ALSO
perlpod, Pod::Perldoc