[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Nov 2019 12:57:41 +0200 |
> Cc: jonas@bernoul.li, 38181@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
> Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 09:57:40 +0100
>
> > Then I'm not sure we can fix such use cases at all, without causing
> > display flickering in much more popular use cases. Do you have any
> > ideas for a possible fix? Could fit-window-to-buffer invoke
> > 'redisplay' internally, perhaps?
>
> It could but it's called way too often to warrant such behavior by
> default.
What are the frequent calls? Help and completions windows come to
mind, but those are interactive, and so I'm not sure I see why calling
redisplay would be a bad idea there. Are there other callers which
I'm missing?
> But we could give it a separate optional argument so users can avoid
> the advice.
That's possible, of course.
> >> But, as I mentioned earlier, the problem shows up with the
> >> scroll bar immediately when Jonas' form is evaluated, see the attached
> >> screenshot.
> >
> > That just means we (or a Lisp program which makes these mode-line
> > modifications) need to recreate and redisplay the scroll bars anew in
> > these cases, right?
>
> Right. But that same program could also redisplay all windows in
> these cases, right?
I meant that calling redisplay should do this automatically.
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, (continued)
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/15
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Jonas Bernoulli, 2019/11/15
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Jonas Bernoulli, 2019/11/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Jonas Bernoulli, 2019/11/17
bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/15
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2019/11/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2019/11/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2019/11/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2019/11/17
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/17
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2019/11/17
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/17
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2019/11/18
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/18
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2019/11/18
bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Jonas Bernoulli, 2019/11/16