bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters' raises error for font returned by `xs-list-fonts'

[Drew Adams]

> And other bug mails are not missing the bug number
> from the Subject line.
> 
> And even Lars's mails from other days were not
> missing bug numbers from the Subject line.  Maybe
> it's only these few bugs; dunno.

I take it back that no other bug mails show the
problem.  Just got the attached mail from Stefan K.,
which shows the same problem - no bug # in Subject
field.

I haven't changed anything on my end.  And this
problem is new.  Previously, the Subject line always
appeared as does this one now: with bug#...: followed
by the release number - not just starting with the
release number (no bug #):

  RE: bug#14659: 24.3.50; `modify-frame-parameters'...
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: 24.1.50; Regression: incorrect Lisp indentation for `if' with `@@@@@@'
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 1 Nov 2019 12:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>
>
> found 11314 27.0.50
> thanks
>
> "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
>
> > emacs -Q
> >  
> > Type this into an Emacs Lisp buffer:
> >  
> > (if (alpha beta) C-j aaaaaa C-j bbbbbb
> >  
> > You get this:
> >  
> > (if (alpha beta)
> >     aaaaaa
> >   bbbbbb
> >  
> > That is correct.  bbbbbb is indented correctly.
> >  
> > Now do the same thing, using @@@@@@ instead of aaaaaa.  This is the
> > result - bbbbbb is indented incorrectly.
> >  
> > (if (alpha beta)
> >     @@@@@@
> >     bbbbbb
> >  
> > Yet @@@@@@ is a perfectly good symbol/variable name etc.
> >  
> > This regression was introduced in Emacs 22.
>
> I can reproduce this on current master.
>
> Best regards,
> Stefan Kangas
>
> --- End Message ---