[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applicat
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:14:39 +0200 |
Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> writes:
> This is the spelling in RFC 3174: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3174
Taking a closer look, they actually use "SHA1" in the document
headline, but "SHA-1" in the body text. So it's a bit of a mess.
I guess the important thing is that we use one spelling consistently
to avoid confusing users even more.
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas
- bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications, (continued)
- bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/09/17
- bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications, Robert Pluim, 2019/09/17
- bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications, Stefan Kangas, 2019/09/28
- bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/09/28
- bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/09/17
- bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications, Stefan Kangas, 2019/09/17
- bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/09/17
- bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications, Stefan Kangas, 2019/09/17
- bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications,
Stefan Kangas <=
- bug#37420: [PATCH] Recommend against SHA-1 for security-related applications, Stefan Kangas, 2019/09/20