|
From: | Drew Adams |
Subject: | bug#22457: 24.5; [PATCH] `dired-mark-if' should not count non-changes |
Date: | Wed, 26 Jun 2019 06:32:46 -0700 (PDT) |
> I think it's better to say (eq (char-after) dired-marker-char). Yes, good. Not a big deal either way, but that's simpler and clearer.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |