[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#36123: find-dired vs. dired-sort-toggle-or-edit
From: |
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson |
Subject: |
bug#36123: find-dired vs. dired-sort-toggle-or-edit |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Jun 2019 09:00:41 +0800 |
In find-dired, hitting "s" gives
dired-sort-toggle-or-edit: Cannot sort this Dired buffer
Well, it certainly still could, if behind the scenes it did
(setq find-ls-option '("-exec ls -dilsbt {} \\;" . "-dilsbt"))
And also C-u s could be emulated if behind the scenes it took the
argument we gave it and plugged it in like:
(setq find-ls-option '("-exec ls -ld {} \\;" . "-ld"))
(setq find-ls-option '("-exec ls -ogd {} \\;" . "-ogd"))
(setq find-ls-option '("-exec ls -ogdt {} \\;" . "-ogdt"))
In fact on (info "(emacs) Dired and Find")
it would be great to tell folks that there is the above method for
making find-dired look exactly like original dired (without any -is mess
or ls -R gaps!)
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#36123: find-dired vs. dired-sort-toggle-or-edit,
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <=