bug#35163: 25.1; `narrow-to-region' docstring no mention of args

[Emanuel Berg]

Noam Postavsky wrote:

>> Or at least a clear description of
>> the problem.
>
> To be fair, message [11] is fairly clear and
> pretty close to what Glenn wrote (perhaps it
> misses the emphasis on satisfying checkdoc).

I agree that message 11 is fairly clear,
however checkdoc is mentioned there as well:
"(checkdoc-current-buffer t) would tell you
this ..."

> Things unfortunately derailed after that.
> An 80+ line elisp riddle on a report about
> a docstring bug is surely a sign something
> has gone horribly wrong...

Ha ha :D

> [11]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35163#11

-- 
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573