[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#34785: 26.1; fake function-key typos
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#34785: 26.1; fake function-key typos |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Mar 2019 13:24:32 +0200 |
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 09:08:34 -0800 (PST)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Cc: 34785-done@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> Elsewhere in the manual, "fake function key" refers
> to the symbol itself
Some of those are bugs, some not.
> e.g., in node `Menu Bar':
>
> "the fake function key 'menu-bar'"
>
> Not `<menu-bar>'. And not `<MENU-BAR>'.
Fixed.
> "To add an item to the menu bar, invent a fake function key of your
> own (let's call it KEY), and make a binding for the key sequence
> '[menu-bar KEY]'."
>
> Not `<KEY>'. (And KEY is a placeholder here.)
Exactly, and so it shouldn't be marked up as a key.
> "Here, 'edit' is the fake function key"
I fixed this in a different way.
> "a list of fake function keys.... The default value
> is '(help-menu)'"
>
> Not `(<help-menu>)'. And not `<HELP-MENU>'.
Here help-menu is a symbol in a list, so the markup is correct.
> And in node `Tool Bar':
>
> "fake function key called 'tool-bar'"
>
> Not `(<tool-bar>)'. And not `<TOOL-BAR>'.
Fixed.
> The bug I cited is the only place where the treatment
> is different, whether or not you argue that `<EAT>'
> there is a key label.
That place uses the correct markup.
Thanks.