Hi Juri and Dmitry
Any simplification to the implementation that keeps the
"keep original window intent" behavior across xref
intermediate buffers is very welcome.
Juri, do you understand what that particular sub-feature
is about? I wish I had written some tests to go with it
but testing window code is tricky. I will still try, that way
you needn't worry about understanding it and can program
"against the rails".
However here's a tangent that might affect the decision.
Is there any impediment to making xref.el a core ELPA
package? I can see some advantages... The reason I bring
this up here is that using very new elisp in a file can reduce
the usefulness of that goal, which in this case would be
to bring new xref features to users of Emacs 26.1/26.2.
Perhaps it is already using post-26 features in which case
the ship has sailed. In that case, disregard this tangent.
João
Hi Juri,
On 25.12.2018 22:42, Juri Linkov wrote:
> X-Debbugs-CC: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
>
> There is no more need to replace switch-to-buffer with
> pop-to-buffer-same-window in xref--pop-to-location
> like was asked in https://debbugs.gnu.org/32790#206
> because now a new option switch-to-buffer-obey-display-actions
> can be customized to t.
Sorry I never responded, see the message in that other thread.
> But still there is one xref command, namely `xref-goto-xref' bound to
> RET in the *xref* buffer that always displays the buffer in the
> predefined window, and there is no way to change this behavior.
>
> Is it possible to change it to use either pop-to-buffer-same-window
> or at least switch-to-buffer?
IIUC you want to change xref--show-pos-in-buf to use
pop-to-buffer-same-window or switch-to-buffer instead of display-buffer.
Would you like to propose a patch that would still honor the 'action'
argument (or the values of xref--original-window* directly)?
Also pinging João who wrote that code.