[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#32037: simplify possessive form's "functions' definitions"
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
bug#32037: simplify possessive form's "functions' definitions" |
|
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jul 2018 19:40:38 +0300 |
tags 32037 notabug
thanks
> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Cc: Van L <van@scratch.space>, 32037@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 21:59:58 +0200
>
> > Thanks, but AFAIK the original wording is perfectly correct English
> > (if not more correct). Why did you think it needed to be changed?
>
> The original is fine. I wish there was less going around changing
> perfectly good sentences in our documentation (as opposed to editing
> for clarity).
Agreed, closing.