[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#25030: 25.1; Unexpected indentation and syntax-highlighting in `emac
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
bug#25030: 25.1; Unexpected indentation and syntax-highlighting in `emacs-lisp-mode' |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:14:07 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
>> I disagree. The interpreter and byte compiler do not care about the
>> indentation style that you choose for your code: the syntax and
>> semantics are unaffected.
>>
>> Style choices should not produce warnings. An indication that code layout
>> is following an unusual style may be useful, but it should be optional, and
>> it should not use the warning face (it should have a separate face that can
>> be customised independently of the warning face).
>
> What Andy said. This has nothing to do with byte-compiling
> (or interpreting, for that matter).
I don't understand why you guys are all of a sudden talking about
byte-compiling.
> It should be easy for users to give the face(s) used for
> stylistic highlighting different appearance(s) from standard
> Emacs faces that have other meanings.
Anyway, if this just about reorganizing the faces used, I have no
objections.