[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#30068: 26.0; REGRESSION: no doc for `x-display-pixel-*'
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#30068: 26.0; REGRESSION: no doc for `x-display-pixel-*' |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:25:11 +0200 |
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:19:18 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Cc: 30068@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
> > Cc: 30068@debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:26:02 -0500
> >
> > Keep the real doc only in xfns.c, makes the others just say <skip>, or
> > <see:xfns.c>, and change Fsnarf_documentation to respect <skip>.
>
> Sounds fine. Are there any downsides?
Btw, there's another, perhaps easier alternative: have only one
definition of the function, with the single copy of the doc string,
and then make it call the platform-dependent parts on the C level.
- bug#30068: 26.0; REGRESSION: no doc for `x-display-pixel-*', Drew Adams, 2018/01/10
- bug#30068: 26.0; REGRESSION: no doc for `x-display-pixel-*', Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/10
- bug#30068: 26.0; REGRESSION: no doc for `x-display-pixel-*', Glenn Morris, 2018/01/10
- bug#30068: 26.0; REGRESSION: no doc for `x-display-pixel-*', Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/10
- bug#30068: 26.0; REGRESSION: no doc for `x-display-pixel-*', Glenn Morris, 2018/01/11
- bug#30068: 26.0; REGRESSION: no doc for `x-display-pixel-*', Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/11
- bug#30068: 26.0; REGRESSION: no doc for `x-display-pixel-*',
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#30068: 26.0; REGRESSION: no doc for `x-display-pixel-*', Glenn Morris, 2018/01/12
- bug#30068: 26.0; REGRESSION: no doc for `x-display-pixel-*', Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/13
- bug#30068: 26.0; REGRESSION: no doc for `x-display-pixel-*', Glenn Morris, 2018/01/20
- bug#30068: 26.0; REGRESSION: no doc for `x-display-pixel-*', Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/20
- bug#30068: 26.0; REGRESSION: no doc for `x-display-pixel-*', Richard Stallman, 2018/01/11