[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#28609: simple.el
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#28609: simple.el |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Sep 2017 11:12:51 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 19:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Cc: 28609@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > Finally, a nit: "Point position" is inherently ambiguous, so it's
> > better to use "Position of point" to disambiguate. I made that change
> > in a followup commit.
>
> Apologies for not reading the thread. Going only by what is written
> here, which might not be fair/appropriate, "position of point" is
> also ill-advised. "Point" is the buffer position of the cursor
> (text-insertion position). "Position of point" would then mean
> "position of position of the cursor".
"Point" is Emacs terminology (and its definition in Glossary is not
"position of the cursor"). Since it's a widely-used term, I see no
need to replace "point" with its definition to judge that sentence's
grammar or style. We use "position of point" in our manuals, and I
see no problem with that usage.