bug#28258: 26.0.50; [PATCH] Let file-name-base succeed when buffer-file-

bug-gnu-emacs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#28258: 26.0.50; [PATCH] Let file-name-base succeed when buffer-file-

From:	Philipp Stephani
Subject:	bug#28258: 26.0.50; [PATCH] Let file-name-base succeed when buffer-file-name is nil
Date:	Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:31:29 +0000

Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> schrieb am Di., 19. Sep. 2017 um 02:41 Uhr:

> I do agree that the calling convention of `file-name-base' is odd. How
> about making the argument mandatory (initially only by changing the
> advertised calling convention and the docstring)?

Sounds good to me.

OK, here's a patch.

0001-lisp-files.el-file-name-base-Make-FILENAME-argument-ma.txt
Description: Text document

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

bug#28258: 26.0.50; [PATCH] Let file-name-base succeed when buffer-file-name is nil, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/18
- bug#28258: 26.0.50; [PATCH] Let file-name-base succeed when buffer-file-name is nil, Glenn Morris, 2017/09/18
  - bug#28258: 26.0.50; [PATCH] Let file-name-base succeed when buffer-file-name is nil, Philipp Stephani <=
    - bug#28258: 26.0.50; [PATCH] Let file-name-base succeed when buffer-file-name is nil, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/19
    - bug#28258: 26.0.50; [PATCH] Let file-name-base succeed when buffer-file-name is nil, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/24

Prev by Date: bug#28508: 26.0.60; Problem with mkdir() on root drive (ms-windows)
Next by Date: bug#28258: 26.0.50; [PATCH] Let file-name-base succeed when buffer-file-name is nil
Previous by thread: bug#28258: 26.0.50; [PATCH] Let file-name-base succeed when buffer-file-name is nil
Next by thread: bug#28258: 26.0.50; [PATCH] Let file-name-base succeed when buffer-file-name is nil
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread