[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*
From: |
npostavs |
Subject: |
bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let* |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Sep 2017 23:05:07 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza@udel.edu> writes:
> (and-let* ((x ...)
> (y ...)
> ((x > y)))
> ...)
I assume you meant (> x y), unless you've managed to somehow squeeze an
infix expression parser into that patch above ;)
> I didn't try writing it in the style of if-let*--perhaps if-let* could
> be extended and all three macros would learn (EXPR).
Yes, I think it's best if all foo-let* macros interpret the varlist in
the same way.
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/01
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*,
npostavs <=
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/02
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/09/02
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/02
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Noam Postavsky, 2017/09/02
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/09/03
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/03
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/03
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/09/04
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/04
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/09/05