[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#28066: eshell-tramp sudo ignores C-c
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#28066: eshell-tramp sudo ignores C-c |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Aug 2017 22:37:31 +0300 |
> From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>
> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 21:29:33 +0200
> Cc: 28066@debbugs.gnu.org, yegortimoshenko@gmail.com
>
> I've implemented this as advice on `interrupt-process', but this is
> discouraged for primitives. Maybe we should spend `interrupt-process' a
> hook where Tramp could enter? Or even a file name handler, based on
> default-directory of the related process-buffer?
In such cases, we usually provide a variable whose value is a
function. The default value is a function that does whatever
interrupt-process is doing now, and Tramp can replace it with its own
function.
Does this make sense in your case?
- bug#28066: eshell-tramp sudo ignores C-c, Yegor Timoshenko, 2017/08/12
- bug#28066: eshell-tramp sudo ignores C-c, Michael Albinus, 2017/08/13
- bug#28066: eshell-tramp sudo ignores C-c, Richard Stallman, 2017/08/13
- bug#28066: eshell-tramp sudo ignores C-c, Michael Albinus, 2017/08/20
- bug#28066: eshell-tramp sudo ignores C-c,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#28066: eshell-tramp sudo ignores C-c, Michael Albinus, 2017/08/20
- bug#28066: eshell-tramp sudo ignores C-c, Michael Albinus, 2017/08/21
- bug#28066: eshell-tramp sudo ignores C-c, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/08/21
- bug#28066: eshell-tramp sudo ignores C-c, Michael Albinus, 2017/08/21
- bug#28066: eshell-tramp sudo ignores C-c, Yegor Timoshenko, 2017/08/20
- bug#28066: eshell-tramp sudo ignores C-c, Michael Albinus, 2017/08/21