[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#23486: 25.0.93; Modules: features missing from make_function
From: |
npostavs |
Subject: |
bug#23486: 25.0.93; Modules: features missing from make_function |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Jul 2017 23:40:50 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com> writes:
> This is now done (commit
> 31fded0370c3aa6d2c4370cae21cdb7475873483). This fixes (1) through
> (3). (4) through (6) are still open. That's probably OK if the
> limitations are documented; modules can always do the equivalent of
> (eval ' (defun ...)) to get complete support.
Lisp_Subr's have an intspec field (4), but I agree it's not really
essential. As I think you mentioned in the OP, supporting `declare' (5)
is not doable by definition (because the effects of 'declare' operate on
the symbol, not the function object).
Docstrings containing null or non-Unicode characters (6) just seems
completely pointless to me. Are there any cases using that capability
in Emacs (or outside Emacs)? I would probably consider them as bugs.