|
From: | Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: | bug#26564: Document that only functions and not variables can end with "-p" |
Date: | Wed, 19 Apr 2017 23:44:12 +0200 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes: > 3. Is there a proposal for a _different_ naming convention > for Boolean variables? I'd argue that we should have some > such a naming convention. And I'd argue that it should be > different for options and non-option variables. That's a good point indeed. An alternative to "-p" would be "is-", like `foo-is-negative'. Not using -p would also have an advantage: you could distinguish boolean variables from variables bound to a predicate function. Michael.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |