[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#25565: mark-whole-buffer and unnecessary (point) call
From: |
dptd dptd |
Subject: |
bug#25565: mark-whole-buffer and unnecessary (point) call |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:23:19 +0100 |
> On 29 Jan 2017, at 22:29, Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 22:46:02 +0200 dptd dptd <dptdescribe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Here is the newest patch.
> [...]
>>>> * lisp/emulation/viper-cmd.el (viper-mark-beginning-of-buffer):
>>>> (viper-mark-end-of-buffer):
>>>
>>> There should be no colon `:' after `(viper-mark-beginning-of-buffer)',
>>> since `(viper-mark-end-of-buffer)' in the next line is in the same file.
>>>
>>>> * lisp/cedet/semantic/senator.el (senator-mark-defun):
>>>> * lisp/allout.el (allout-mark-topic): Remove unnecessary argument
>>>> `(point)' from calls to `push-mark'.
>>>
>>> Steve Berman
>>
>> I want to contribute to the project but I cannot even prepare the
>> patch file correctly... dammit!
>
> If that's the worst problem you have as a contributor, Emacs will be
> very lucky indeed! ;-)
>
> Steve Berman
Hello again,
I think my paperwork with FSF is done now. What should I do not to make sure
that patch from the previous messages will be applied by someone?
Best regards,
B.D.
- bug#25565: mark-whole-buffer and unnecessary (point) call,
dptd dptd <=