[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#25671: Feature request: emacs -Q --script as a single binary

From: Clément Pit--Claudel
Subject: bug#25671: Feature request: emacs -Q --script as a single binary
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:45:55 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0

On 2017-02-10 10:02, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Cc: address@hidden
>> From: Clément Pit--Claudel <address@hidden>
>> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:17:00 -0500
>>> I believe changing the program behavior depending on how it was named
>>> in the command that invoked it is against GNU coding standards.
>> What about providing elisp or emacs-script as a separate binary?
> What about it?

Would that be OK? Could it work?  I thought it would make implementation 
simpler to just make the emacs binary ct differently based on how its invoked, 
but if that's not OK then could we distribute a separate "elisp" or 
"emacs-script" binary that can be used in a shebang line?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]