>From 60e43d62735b212738584da0631c8efc768084c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Noam Postavsky Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 14:09:13 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v1] Use expanded stack during regex matches While the stack is increased in main(), to allow the regex stack allocation to use alloca we also need to modify regex.c to actually take advantage of the increased stack, and not limit stack allocations to SAFE_ALLOCA bytes. * src/regex.c (MATCH_MAY_ALLOCATE): Remove obsolete comment about allocations in signal handlers which no longer happens. (emacs_re_safe_alloca): New variable. (REGEX_USE_SAFE_ALLOCA): Use it as the limit of stack allocation instead of MAX_ALLOCA. (emacs_re_max_failures): Rename from `re_max_failures' to avoid confusion the glibc's `re_max_failures'. * src/emacs.c (main): Increase the amount of fixed 'extra' bytes we add to the stack. Instead of changing emacs_re_max_failures based on the new stack size, just change emacs_re_safe_alloca; emacs_re_max_failures remains constant regardless, since if we run out stack space SAFE_ALLOCA will fall back to heap allocation. --- src/emacs.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- src/regex.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- src/regex.h | 7 ++++++- 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/emacs.c b/src/emacs.c index ae29e9a..cb6b503 100644 --- a/src/emacs.c +++ b/src/emacs.c @@ -831,14 +831,16 @@ main (int argc, char **argv) rlim_t lim = rlim.rlim_cur; /* Approximate the amount regex.c needs per unit of - re_max_failures, then add 33% to cover the size of the + emacs_re_max_failures, then add 33% to cover the size of the smaller stacks that regex.c successively allocates and discards on its way to the maximum. */ - int ratio = 20 * sizeof (char *); - ratio += ratio / 3; + int min_ratio = 20 * sizeof (char *); + int ratio = min_ratio + min_ratio / 3; - /* Extra space to cover what we're likely to use for other reasons. */ - int extra = 200000; + /* Extra space to cover what we're likely to use for other + reasons. For example, a typical GC might take 30K stack + frames. */ + int extra = (30 * 1000) * 50; bool try_to_grow_stack = true; #ifndef CANNOT_DUMP @@ -847,7 +849,7 @@ main (int argc, char **argv) if (try_to_grow_stack) { - rlim_t newlim = re_max_failures * ratio + extra; + rlim_t newlim = emacs_re_max_failures * ratio + extra; /* Round the new limit to a page boundary; this is needed for Darwin kernel 15.4.0 (see Bug#23622) and perhaps @@ -869,9 +871,10 @@ main (int argc, char **argv) lim = newlim; } } - - /* Don't let regex.c overflow the stack. */ - re_max_failures = lim < extra ? 0 : min (lim - extra, SIZE_MAX) / ratio; + /* Let regex.c use more stack, if available. */ + emacs_re_safe_alloca = max + (min (lim - extra, SIZE_MAX) * (min_ratio / ratio), + MAX_ALLOCA); } #endif /* HAVE_SETRLIMIT and RLIMIT_STACK and not CYGWIN */ diff --git a/src/regex.c b/src/regex.c index a2d2c52..adf2fa1 100644 --- a/src/regex.c +++ b/src/regex.c @@ -430,9 +430,12 @@ init_syntax_once (void) /* Should we use malloc or alloca? If REGEX_MALLOC is not defined, we use `alloca' instead of `malloc'. This is because using malloc in - re_search* or re_match* could cause memory leaks when C-g is used in - Emacs; also, malloc is slower and causes storage fragmentation. On - the other hand, malloc is more portable, and easier to debug. + re_search* or re_match* could cause memory leaks when C-g is used + in Emacs (note that SAFE_ALLOCA could also call malloc, but does so + via `record_xmalloc' which uses `unwind_protect' to ensure the + memory is freed even in case of non-local exits); also, malloc is + slower and causes storage fragmentation. On the other hand, malloc + is more portable, and easier to debug. Because we sometimes use alloca, some routines have to be macros, not functions -- `alloca'-allocated space disappears at the end of the @@ -447,7 +450,13 @@ init_syntax_once (void) #else /* not REGEX_MALLOC */ # ifdef emacs -# define REGEX_USE_SAFE_ALLOCA USE_SAFE_ALLOCA +/* This may be adjusted in main(), if the stack is successfully grown. */ +ptrdiff_t emacs_re_safe_alloca = MAX_ALLOCA; +/* Like USE_SAFE_ALLOCA, but use emacs_re_safe_alloca. */ +# define REGEX_USE_SAFE_ALLOCA \ + ptrdiff_t sa_avail = emacs_re_safe_alloca; \ + ptrdiff_t sa_count = SPECPDL_INDEX (); bool sa_must_free = false + # define REGEX_SAFE_FREE() SAFE_FREE () # define REGEX_ALLOCATE SAFE_ALLOCA # else @@ -1203,16 +1212,7 @@ WEAK_ALIAS (__re_set_syntax, re_set_syntax) using the relocating allocator routines, then malloc could cause a relocation, which might (if the strings being searched are in the ralloc heap) shift the data out from underneath the regexp - routines. - - Here's another reason to avoid allocation: Emacs - processes input from X in a signal handler; processing X input may - call malloc; if input arrives while a matching routine is calling - malloc, then we're scrod. But Emacs can't just block input while - calling matching routines; then we don't notice interrupts when - they come in. So, Emacs blocks input around all regexp calls - except the matching calls, which it leaves unprotected, in the - faith that they will not malloc. */ + routines. */ /* Normally, this is fine. */ #define MATCH_MAY_ALLOCATE @@ -1249,9 +1249,9 @@ WEAK_ALIAS (__re_set_syntax, re_set_syntax) whose default stack limit is 2mb. In order for a larger value to work reliably, you have to try to make it accord with the process stack limit. */ -size_t re_max_failures = 40000; +size_t emacs_re_max_failures = 40000; # else -size_t re_max_failures = 4000; +size_t emacs_re_max_failures = 4000; # endif union fail_stack_elt @@ -1304,7 +1304,7 @@ WEAK_ALIAS (__re_set_syntax, re_set_syntax) /* Double the size of FAIL_STACK, up to a limit - which allows approximately `re_max_failures' items. + which allows approximately `emacs_re_max_failures' items. Return 1 if succeeds, and 0 if either ran out of memory allocating space for it or it was already too large. @@ -1319,19 +1319,19 @@ WEAK_ALIAS (__re_set_syntax, re_set_syntax) #define FAIL_STACK_GROWTH_FACTOR 4 #define GROW_FAIL_STACK(fail_stack) \ - (((fail_stack).size >= re_max_failures * TYPICAL_FAILURE_SIZE) \ + (((fail_stack).size >= emacs_re_max_failures * TYPICAL_FAILURE_SIZE) \ ? 0 \ : ((fail_stack).stack \ = REGEX_REALLOCATE_STACK ((fail_stack).stack, \ (fail_stack).size * sizeof (fail_stack_elt_t), \ - min (re_max_failures * TYPICAL_FAILURE_SIZE, \ + min (emacs_re_max_failures * TYPICAL_FAILURE_SIZE, \ ((fail_stack).size * FAIL_STACK_GROWTH_FACTOR)) \ * sizeof (fail_stack_elt_t)), \ \ (fail_stack).stack == NULL \ ? 0 \ : ((fail_stack).size \ - = (min (re_max_failures * TYPICAL_FAILURE_SIZE, \ + = (min (emacs_re_max_failures * TYPICAL_FAILURE_SIZE, \ ((fail_stack).size * FAIL_STACK_GROWTH_FACTOR))), \ 1))) @@ -3638,9 +3638,9 @@ regex_compile (const_re_char *pattern, size_t size, { int num_regs = bufp->re_nsub + 1; - if (fail_stack.size < re_max_failures * TYPICAL_FAILURE_SIZE) + if (fail_stack.size < emacs_re_max_failures * TYPICAL_FAILURE_SIZE) { - fail_stack.size = re_max_failures * TYPICAL_FAILURE_SIZE; + fail_stack.size = emacs_re_max_failures * TYPICAL_FAILURE_SIZE; falk_stack.stack = realloc (fail_stack.stack, fail_stack.size * sizeof *falk_stack.stack); } diff --git a/src/regex.h b/src/regex.h index 34c9929..1d439de 100644 --- a/src/regex.h +++ b/src/regex.h @@ -186,7 +186,12 @@ #endif /* Roughly the maximum number of failure points on the stack. */ -extern size_t re_max_failures; +extern size_t emacs_re_max_failures; + +#ifdef emacs +/* Amount of memory that we can safely stack allocate. */ +extern ptrdiff_t emacs_re_safe_alloca; +#endif /* Define combinations of the above bits for the standard possibilities. -- 2.9.3