[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#23738: [feature request] eww allow multiple buffer
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
bug#23738: [feature request] eww allow multiple buffer |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:09:24 -0500 |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
> Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza@udel.edu> writes:
>
>> What happens when I navigate to another site in the same buffer? Then
>> the buffer name is deceptive. Both s and S show the site and/or title,
>> and the header line of the eww buffer always has both, so this change seems
>> strange IMHO.
>
> On the other hand, we also have other buffers that have names that
> may become misleading after a while. For instance:
>
> (buffer-name) -> "*unsent wide reply to Mark Oteiza*"
>
> Even if I remove you from the headers, the buffer doesn't change name.
> :-) So there's precedence.
There's precedence in the other direction too: when you do
dired-find-alternate-file the buffer name changes.
> The fourth is to revert to the previous meaningless buffer names, i.e.,
> *eww*<254> etc.
If the buffer name will be meaningless, setting
`list-buffers-directory' to the url so it shows up in the buffer
listing could be useful.
- bug#23738: [feature request] eww allow multiple buffer, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2017/01/24
- bug#23738: [feature request] eww allow multiple buffer, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2017/01/25
- bug#23738: [feature request] eww allow multiple buffer, Mark Oteiza, 2017/01/26
- bug#23738: [feature request] eww allow multiple buffer, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2017/01/26
- bug#23738: [feature request] eww allow multiple buffer, Mark Oteiza, 2017/01/26
- bug#23738: [feature request] eww allow multiple buffer, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2017/01/26
- bug#23738: [feature request] eww allow multiple buffer, Mark Oteiza, 2017/01/26
- bug#23738: [feature request] eww allow multiple buffer, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2017/01/26