[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#25443: Unnecessary building of dictionary files
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
bug#25443: Unnecessary building of dictionary files |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:57:53 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
The crucial question here is whether the Lisp code qualifies as source code.
Supposing we want to change that code one day,
is the Lisp code a good form for editing that program
as the current source form?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- bug#25443: Unnecessary building of dictionary files, (continued)
- bug#25443: Unnecessary building of dictionary files, Richard Stallman, 2017/01/14
- bug#25443: Unnecessary building of dictionary files, Phillip Lord, 2017/01/16
- bug#25443: Unnecessary building of dictionary files, Richard Stallman, 2017/01/17
- bug#25443: Unnecessary building of dictionary files, Phillip Lord, 2017/01/17
- bug#25443: Unnecessary building of dictionary files, Richard Stallman, 2017/01/18
- bug#25443: Unnecessary building of dictionary files, Phillip Lord, 2017/01/19
- bug#25443: Unnecessary building of dictionary files, Richard Stallman, 2017/01/19
- bug#25443: Unnecessary building of dictionary files, Phillip Lord, 2017/01/19
- bug#25443: Unnecessary building of dictionary files, Richard Stallman, 2017/01/21
- bug#25443: Unnecessary building of dictionary files, handa, 2017/01/24
- bug#25443: Unnecessary building of dictionary files,
Richard Stallman <=