[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#24953: 25.1; Possible inefficiency in UTF-8

From: Eli Barzilay
Subject: bug#24953: 25.1; Possible inefficiency in UTF-8
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 05:53:33 -0500

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> From: Eli Barzilay <address@hidden>
>> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 16:38:07 -0500
>> Cc: address@hidden
>> In the latter case, my shell has an explicit LANG setting and the
>> result is that Emacs opens that file fine, but in the first case,
>> when Emacs is started directly by windows, there is no LANG, and the
>> utf-8 file is not treated as such (looks like it opens it in
>> latin-1).  I verified this with "emacs -Q" too.
> Emacs sets LANG internally, by using a suitable Windows API, when it
> runs on Windows (unless LANG is set in the shell), so the fact that
> LANG is not set is not a problem in itself.
> What you describe is expected with the default Windows settings: a
> file that is in no particular mode which requires UTF-8 will not be
> automatically decoded as UTF-8, without some customizations.  You
> could also put file-local variables into the file.

I still didn't get to try and see if I can get the git problem, but the
problem seems to be moot for me: I use *both* Linux and Windows, a lot.
I synchronize files between the two, and I work with Linux mounts on
Windows.  In short, I have a ton of files that are UTF-8, so it makes
sense to have it be my default on Windows too.  In the around-month-or-
so which I used without it, I ran into several cases where the default
character encoding was broken, and OTOH, in years of using an explicit
UTF-8 I haven't had any problems...

                   ((x=>x(x))(x=>x(x)))                  Eli Barzilay:
                   http://barzilay.org/                  Maze is Life!

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]