bug#25129: 26.0.50; seq-some function

[Nicolas Petton]

Pierre Lorenzon <devel@pollock-nageoire.net> writes:

Hi Pierre,

> I well understand now that I must use seq-find instead of
> seq-some but I think that I will not be the only one being
> confused by these functions specifications !

There is a mistake (extra if) in the documentation, I will fix that.

Other than that, is the following less confusing?

  Return non-nil if PRED returns non-nil for at least one element of SEQUENCE.
  If so, return the value returned by PRED.

Cheers,
Nico

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature