|Subject:||bug#25107: Acknowledgement (Patches to clean up ispell.el)|
|Date:||Tue, 6 Dec 2016 18:11:16 +0000|
> From: Reuben Thomas <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 17:46:23 +0000
> Cc: address@hidden
> I agree with the general point, but in this case we are talking about
> mentioning a small number of file names in the doc string. Doesn't
> seem like a burden to me, and whoever put that information there
> probably didn't see it as such, either.
> In that case I will add the information for Enchant. At least it is not likely to change.
Sure, that's what I meant.
> I was thinking about someone using the result to report the version
> they have, e.g. as part of a bug report.
> Version of what? If of Emacs, then that version information is already provided by report-emacs-bug. If of a
> spellchecker, then that information is still provided by the revised message.
It's admittedly a minor issue, but just to make myself clear: I
thought about reporting the version not as part of report-emacs-bug.
Or let me ask this: why does ispell-version at all exist? Perhaps I'm
confused about its purpose.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|