[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24526: iconify / geometry
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#24526: iconify / geometry |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:10:05 +0200 |
> I elaborated a little further on this topic. Say, I was to start emacs (25.1)
> with
>
> emacs -geometry 135x34+35+20 -iconic
>
> xwininfo tells me:
[...]
> Corners: +41+57 -320+57 -320-336 +41-336
What do these corner values mean?
> -geometry 109x24+35+20
>
> after "uniconifying" the frame. Leaving "-iconic" away, things come out as
> expected. I have no idea how 109x24 would correlate with 135x34.
Neither do I. Please tell me what ‘frame-geometry’ tells about this
frame. Maybe it's relaed to the frame's default font size.
The surprising thing about this is that here on Windows the -geometry
option is processed as expected. So this looks like a good place to
start investigating this on Windows. Can anyone on GNU/Linux try with
Dieter's options, that is
emacs -geometry 135x34+35+20 -iconic
and report here _if they work_ as expected?
Thanks, martin
- bug#24526: iconifying / framesize, Dr.-Ing. Dieter Jurzitza, 2016/09/24
- bug#24526: iconify / geometry, Dr.-Ing. Dieter Jurzitza, 2016/09/26
- bug#24526: iconify / geometry,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#24526: iconifying / framesize, martin rudalics, 2016/09/27
- bug#24526: @ Bug 24526, please find textfile results attached ..., Dr.-Ing. Dieter Jurzitza, 2016/09/27
- bug#24526: iconifying / framesize, Dr.-Ing. Dieter Jurzitza, 2016/09/29