[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Apr 2016 10:40:59 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 12:53:37 +0200
> From: Anders Lindgren <andlind@gmail.com>
> Cc: Brief Busters <dgutov@yandex.ru>, 23179@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> If we have an option, then adding a command that binds that option to
> one value or the other is very simple. So I'm puzzled why you don't
> see this as a step in the right direction. Can you point me to what
> I'm missing here?
>
> There are two features of tags-search that I would like to see retained in an
> xref shape. The first is the
> "incremental" bit, that matches are displayed directly when found (but also
> that it respects the current point
> position -- if I move the point the the end of a buffer, the rest of that
> buffer is skipped, etc.) The second is the
> be able to do the search without the xref UI.
>
> The patch only address the second case, if I understand correctly.
Indeed, the patch addresses only one of the two features you
requested. But doing that exactly means a "step in the right
direction". So I'm unsure why you still disagree that it is a step in
the right direction. I didn't say that it's a complete solution, just
a part of it. The other part still needs to be implemented.
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, (continued)
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/08
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Anders Lindgren, 2016/04/08
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/08
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Anders Lindgren, 2016/04/08
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/08
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/04/08
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Anders Lindgren, 2016/04/08
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/04/08
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/03
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/04/03
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, John Wiegley, 2016/04/03
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/04/03
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Anders Lindgren, 2016/04/04
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/04/04
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Anders Lindgren, 2016/04/04
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/04/04
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/04
- bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/04/04