[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 10:40:59 +0300

> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 12:53:37 +0200
> From: Anders Lindgren <address@hidden>
> Cc: Brief Busters <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>  If we have an option, then adding a command that binds that option to
>  one value or the other is very simple. So I'm puzzled why you don't
>  see this as a step in the right direction. Can you point me to what
>  I'm missing here?
> There are two features of tags-search that I would like to see retained in an 
> xref shape. The first is the
> "incremental" bit, that matches are displayed directly when found (but also 
> that it respects the current point
> position -- if I move the point the the end of a buffer, the rest of that 
> buffer is skipped, etc.) The second is the
> be able to do the search without the xref UI.
> The patch only address the second case, if I understand correctly.

Indeed, the patch addresses only one of the two features you
requested.  But doing that exactly means a "step in the right
direction".  So I'm unsure why you still disagree that it is a step in
the right direction.  I didn't say that it's a complete solution, just
a part of it.  The other part still needs to be implemented.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]