bug#7918: [PATCH] cc-mode: only the first clause of a for-loop should be checked for declarations

[Alan Mackenzie]

Hello, Daniel.

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:05:47AM -0800, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> On 03/01/2016 10:02 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:48:13PM +1030, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> >> Daniel Colascione <dan.colascione@gmail.com> writes:

> >>> // This code has no variable declarations

> >>> void foo() {
> >>>     for (; (DWORD) a * b ;)
> >>>         ;

> >>>     for (; a * b ;)
> >>>         ;
> >>> }


> It's been years since I even thought about that code. If you're up for
> it, I'd rather you supply a separate fix.

OK, here goes:


diff -r f19a4ffb060b cc-fonts.el
--- a/cc-fonts.el       Fri Apr 01 12:23:17 2016 +0000
+++ b/cc-fonts.el       Fri Apr 01 16:10:57 2016 +0000
@@ -1206,8 +1206,20 @@
                           'font-lock-keyword-face)
                       (looking-at c-not-decl-init-keywords))
                  (and c-macro-with-semi-re
-                      (looking-at c-macro-with-semi-re))) ; 2008-11-04
-             ;; Don't do anything more if we're looking at a keyword that
+                      (looking-at c-macro-with-semi-re)) ; 2008-11-04
+                 (save-excursion ; A construct after a ; in a `for' statement
+                                 ; can't be a declaration.
+                   (and (c-go-up-list-backward)
+                        (eq (char-after) ?\()
+                        (progn (c-backward-syntactic-ws)
+                               (c-simple-skip-symbol-backward))
+                        (looking-at c-paren-stmt-key)
+                        (progn (goto-char match-pos)
+                               (while (and (eq (char-before) ?\))
+                                           (c-go-list-backward))
+                                 (c-backward-syntactic-ws))
+                               (eq (char-before) ?\;)))))
+             ;; Don't do anything more if we're looking at something that
              ;; can't start a declaration.
              t
 

Could you do the usual with this patch, please, then if everything's OK,
I can commit it to the emacs-25 branch.  Thanks!

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).